Category: Teaching and Learning with Technology

Resources for Teaching and Learning with Technology

From CUNY Academic Commons

Image:Teachingandlearning.jpg

On Pedagogy

Online Resources

Educational Technology with Reports from the Research and Development Group

HOME | NEXT (On Pedagogy: Basic Principles)

Technology on the Commons


From CUNY Academic Commons

This page list all of the blogs and groups that concern technology on the Commons.

Blogs:

1960-1985 Computer Historical Moments

AC101 Computer Literacy

Academic Technology in Higher Education

The Bleeding Edge

CIS

CUNY CAT Research and Development Group Blog

CUNY Developers Forum

CUNY Digital Humanities Intiative

CUNY IT Conference

Educational Technology – Graduate and Undergraduate

Instructional Technology World

Intersections – Technology & Pedagogy & Content

IT Therefore I Am

Prestidigitation

Random Interweb Findings

Tech in the Trenches

Technologusto

Tributaries

Groups:

Please note that some of these groups are private and may have restrictions on membership.

CAT R&D Subcommittee

City Tech Technology Committee

Committee on Online and Hybrid Education at Baruch College

CPATH at City Tech

CUNY Committee on Academic Technology

CUNY Committee on Academic Technology: Research and Development Group

CUNY Developers Forum

CUNY GC ITP Program

CUNY iTunesU Management Council Team

CUNY Technology Group

Digital Humanities Initiative

Digital Studies Group

Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy

LMS (Blackboard and Alternatives)

Online/Blended Learning Considerations

Open Access Publishing Network @ CUNY

Open Education at CUNY

Open-Source Evangelists at City Tech

The Digital University Planning Committee

Wiki Wrangling

WordPress HELP!!

Universal Design and Access (ADA)

From CUNY Academic Commons

Image:Teachingandlearning.jpg

Contents

Universal Design and Access (ADA)

Disability Definitions 

  • The Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The term “disability” means…a physical or mental impairment that constitutes or results in a substantial impediment to employment; or…a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. 29 USC §705(9). Individual with a disability…[T]he term “individual with a disability” means…any person who (i) has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person’s major life activities; (ii) has a record of such an impairment; or (iii) is regarded as having such an impairment, 29 USC §705(20)(B).
  • The Americans with Disabilities Act. The term “disability” means, with respect to an individual—(A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment. 42 USC §12102(2).
  • New York State Human Rights Law. The term “disability” means (a) a physical, mental or medical impairment resulting from anatomical, physiological, genetic or neurological conditions which prevents the exercise of a normal bodily function or is demonstrable by medically accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques or (b) a record of such an impairment or (c) a condition regarded by others as such an impairment, provided, however, that in all provisions of this article dealing with employment, the term shall be limited to disabilities which, upon the provision of reasonable accommodations, do not prevent the complainant from performing in a reasonable manner the activities involved in the job or occupation sought or held. Executive Law §292(21).
  • New York City Administrative Code. The term “physical or mental impairment” means a physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: neurological; musculoskeletal; special sense organs; respiratory, including speech organs; cardiovascular; reproductive; digestive; genito-urinary; hemic and lymphatic; skin and endocrine; or a mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, developmental disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities. It includes, but is not limited to, such diseases and conditions as orthopedic, visual, speech and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, alcoholism, substance abuse, and drug addition. Admin. Code §8-102(16)(b).

Section 503 – Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, administered by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, applies to all federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts of $10,000 or more. It mandates affirmative action to employ and advance in employment, qualified people with disabilities. In addition, it requires all recipients with 50 or more employees and one or more federal contracts of $50,000 or more to prepare and maintain affirmative action programs.

Section 504 – Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in federally funded programs and activities. The Justice Department’s Disability Rights Section is responsible for coordinating government-wide efforts to comply with Section 504.

The Americans with Disabilities Act – The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guarantees disabled people access to employment, public accommodations, transportation, public services and telecommunications. The ADA provides comprehensive federal civil rights protection for people with disabilities.

New York State Human Rights Executive Law 296 – Executive Law §296(1)(a) makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment a disabled individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment. Executive Law §296(3)(a) requires an employer to provide reasonable accommodations to the known disabilities of an employee, prospective employee in connection with a job or occupation sought or held or participation in a training program. Executive Law §296(b) provides that nothing contained in this subdivision shall be construed to require provision of accommodations that can be demonstrated to impose an undue hardship on the operation of an employer’s business program or enterprise. Executive Law §296(7) makes it unlawful discriminatory practice for any person engaged in any activity to which this section applies to retaliate or discriminate against any person because he or she has opposed any practices forbidden under this article or because he or she has filed a complaint, testified or assisted in any proceeding under this article.

ADA/504 Compliance Coordinator – The 504/ADA Compliance Coordinator is appointed by the President. This person is responsible for:

  • Monitoring the college for 504/ADA compliance
  • Resolving issues before they become potential grievances
  • Making sure that disabled employees are accommodated
  • Making sure that disabled students receive the same opportunities that other
  • students receive in the most integrated fashion
  • Providing training to those who must interact with the disabled.

504/ADA Committee – The 504/ADA Committee serves as an advisory committee to the 504/ADA Coordinator. The committee assists in formulating new ideas and monitoring the College for 504/ADA Compliance. The Committee is comprised of representatives from various divisions, departments, programs, and services that make up the College. The Coordinator for Disabled Student Services is a member of the committee.

Reasonable Accommodations – The term “reasonable accommodation” means actions taken which permit an employee or prospective employee with a disability to perform in a reasonable manner the activities involved in the job or occupation sought or held and include, but are not limited to, provision of an accessible worksite, acquisition or modification of equipment, support services for persons with impaired hearing or vision, job restructuring and modified work schedules; provided, however, that such actions do not impose an undue hardship on the business, program or enterprise of the entity from which action is requested. New York State Human Rights Executive Law §292(21-e)

People with Disabilities, Tech.  & the Law with Tim Spofford

Nov. 1, 2010: Tim Spofford presents a public lecture to the university community on the functional and legal importance of ensuring that university technology such as web pages and applications can be accessed by people with disabilities.

Web Accessibility Webinar

Web Accessibility: Know Your Responsibilities

This broadcast was presented by Debi Orton, Manager of Web Services, GOER on October 7, 2010 via Elluminate.
Sponsored by:

  • NYS Disability Services Council
  • Sharon Trerise, Coordinator of Disability Services, Cayuga Community College

Live captioning provided by DBTAC Northeast ADA Center

Creating ADA Compliant Online Courses

“Creating Accessible E-Courses for All Students” project was designed and developed by MS in Instructional Technology student Sheri Anderson to create accessible online courses that meet Americans with Disabilities Act conditions. This project was a requirement for MIT 515: Web Teaching: Design & Development completed in Spring of 2007 under the direction of Dr. Jennifer Summerville.

This course was created using the Course Management System, Blackboard Vista. Please following the following instructions to view the course.

  1. Go to: http://ncvista.blackboard.com
  2. Click on UNC Wilmington
  3. Click Log In

Username: sheri_guest
Password: uncw12

Additional Resources

CUNY Assistive Technology Services Website

CATSweb is an online resource for CUNY‘s assistive technology professionals. CATSweb will provide a unified channel of information on best practices, emerging technologies and tested solutions that provide access to CUNY students with disabilities.

University of Washington’s Technology and Universal Design website

Web Resources, Overview and Value of Technology Access for People with Disabilities, Assistive Technology, and Universal/Accessible Design of Information Technology. (http://www.washington.edu/doit/Resources/technology.html

Resources for Teaching and Learning with Technology | ePortfolios Across CUNY: Aggregating and Integrating Information

Open EdTech Projects at CUNY


From CUNY Academic Commons

Contents

Introduction

Brian Lamb and James Groom are working on an article for EDUCAUSE about “the state of public institutions, open edtech, and the fate of the free world.” They plan to showcase examples of how open source tools and “networked collaboration” shape various open ed projects. Five such projects at CUNY are highlighted below, and Brian and James will use this page as a resource for their article.

e-Portfolios at Macaulay Honors College

Image:Eportfolio Honors.JPG

At Macaulay Honors College, students are encouraged to create e-Portfolios to collect school work, reflect upon it, and “present it to a range of different audiences.”  EPortfolios@Macaulay provides a way for students to creatively record what they have learned through blogs. Students can think of e-Portfolios as  “museums” which contains artifacts of their thinking and learning, and they can invite others “to take a look.”  Some rooms may be private, others exposed to the public.

Macaulay has created a 30-second “commercial” to help students see the variety of uses to which these eportfolios can be put.

And, hot off the press, a 7-minute introduction to what we’ve found and what we’ve gained from using WordPress for this purpose.  “Open Source and Open Directions

CAC.OPHONY Weblog

Image:Cacophony.JPG

CAC.OPHONY is “a weblog on communication-intensive instruction at the college level and its implications for students about to face the challenges of writing and speaking publicly in professional settings.”  Developed at Baruch by the Fellows of the Bernard L. Schwartz Communication Institute,

Blogs at Baruch

Image:BlogsBaruch.JPG

Blogs at Baruch is “an on-line publishing platform platform” for the Baruch Community developed and maintain jointly by the Bernard L. Schwartz Communication Institute and the Baruch Computing and Technology Center.

The site is based on WordPress MU.

Here’s a partial list of projects on the system.

Here are some blog posts that detail its history:

Luke Waltzer, The Path to Blogs@Baruch

Blogs@Baruch Tag Archive at Cac.ophony.org

CUNY Academic Commons

Image:Commons.JPG

Officially launched less than a year ago, the CUNY Academic Commons pulls together professors and graduate students from the 23 separate campus of the City University of New York (CUNY). Members can have individual blogs, join groups, share ideas on group forums, and collaborate on a wiki. There are currently over 1000 members.

The Commons uses Buddy Press as its hub, with WordPress MU and MediaWiki as its spokes.

Looking for Whitman

Image:Whitman.jpg
Started in 2009, Looking for Whitman is a “multi-campus experiment in digital pedagogy” involving four separate schools: New York City College of Technology (CUNY), New York University, University of Mary Washington, and Rutgers University-Camden.

Funding was provided by the NEH Office of Digital Humanities.

The site is set up using WordPress MU.

The Commons Wiki and its Uses

From CUNY Academic Commons

Contents

Introduction

The Academic Commons Wiki is a collaborative space where members create and share resources.  This page provides some background information on wikis, and highlights potential uses.

Photo courtesy of cogdogblog (Creative Commons).

Wiki Background

According to Wikipedia, the term “wiki” comes from the “Wiki-Wiki” shuttle buses that connect the terminals at Honolulu International airport.They are quick and simple, open and transparent.

Wikis are easy to use.  You only need some very basic editing skills to quickly add to a page or create a new one. Editing takes place in the browser, and your content is published to the Web immediately upon saving. For more information on how to create or edit pages on our wiki see the Commons FAQ.

A wiki is composed of articles or pages which can be categorized, or “tagged” so that they are part of a group. The Commons wiki has a “Category Cloud” which enables quick access. Not tagging pages makes them harder to find, and discourages collaboration.

Wikis have lots of hyperlinks.  See: Got Cool Links? Share them on our wiki

An Information Repository

A wiki stores information which is collectively created and edited.  Collaboration is encouraged.  The Commons has some very active group wikis.  A nice example is the e-Portfolios Committee.

Open source communities quickly latched onto wikis as effective tools to document their software.  Wikipedia’s success brought further attention to wikis and their ability to function as collective repositories of information. On the Commons wiki we have a category called CUNY ITunes U which contains background information about our campuses’ presence on iTunes U, as well as guidelines and best practices.  For more information, see CUNY iTunes U on our Wiki.

Various file types may be downloaded to our wiki, including pdf, txt, doc, and ppt.  Hyperlinks to these as well as video-embeds to services such as youtube.com and blip.tv make a wiki repository very convenient and immediate.  RSS feeds will soon be available as we continue to work to improve our wiki.

Collaborative Writing

The Commons wiki is great for working on pages that need constant updating, and whose content evolves over time. Changes can be made quickly, and publication is immediate. Groups can collaborate on projects, gather together information, and compile answers to frequently asked questions.  Some examples of ways the Commons wiki is being used include:

  • group projects
  • grant proposals
  • guidelines
  • standard practices
  • sharing lesson plans
  • meeting notes
  • announcements

Teaching with wikis

Wikis have been widely used in education. As an alternative to course management tools such as Blackboard, they allow classes to collaborate and publish writing projects.  50 Ways to use wikis is a good resource which shows the various ways to use wikis in the classroom.

Though the Commons wiki cannot currently support undergraduate course management, graduate level course integration is encouraged.

Underlying Technology

There are many wiki software packages available, mostly open source (see Wikipedia’s List of wikis).  The Creative Commons uses MediaWiki which, like WordPress, is based on PHP and MySql.  MediaWiki has a vibrant user community which tracks defects and develops new releases and extensions which can be added to the program’s core for additional functionality. Thousands of websites are powered partially or totally by wiki technology.  The use of skins often makes wikis difficult to detect.

Other wikis

  • Of course the most well known wiki is Wikipedia. Love it or hate it, it is a cultural phenomenon.
  • ICT For Education Wiki is a worth checking out.  This is a great repository of tutorials, documentation, articles, and projects.  It employs the MediaWiki book tool which allows a user to create a personalized book from the pages of the wiki and then download to a pdf or send to a vendor for physical publication.

Related Pages


Educational Blogs

From CUNY Academic Commons

Image:Teachingandlearning.jpg

Blogs

Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms by Will Richardson, 2006, Corwin Press. This book provides a comprehensive explanation and is an outstanding pedagogical resource.

Exploring the Use of Blogs as Learning Spaces in the Higher Education Sector Into the Blogoshere  Here are opening lines of this site: “This online, edited collection explores discursive, visual, social, and other communicative features of weblogs. Essays analyze and critique situated cases and examples drawn from weblogs and weblog communities.”

Language and the Internet This is an excerpt from a recent book by the linguist David Crystal, who describes the language of blogs as,  “. . . .written language in its most naked form.”

Tomorrow’s Professor Blog This collaboration between MIT and Stanford describes itself as “a place for discussion about teaching and learning, and general issues concerning higher education.”

WordPress a Better LMS The author discusses using a blog as an alternative to Blackboard or other Learning Management Systems.

HOME | Web 2.0 Teaching Tools and Resources

Related Pages

Wikis in the Classroom

From CUNY Academic Commons

Image:Teachingandlearning.jpg

7 Things You Should Know About Wikis This article explains how students–and faculty–can use wikis to collaborate on.

Using Wikis as Collaborative Writing Tools This webtext focuses on the use of wiki as a tool for writing and for teaching writing. (by Susan Loudermilk Garza and Tommy Hern)

Teaching and learning online with wikis from the conference proceedings of the ASCILITE (Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education) in 2004. Pretty basic and focused on online teaching, but a good overview (it’s early–2004 is a long, long time ago in internet time).

Wikis and Wikipedia as a Teaching Tool From the International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Very comprehensive, and includes both wikipedia and using your own wikis in class. And also provides a good overview of other research.

50 Ways to use wikis Great suggestions on how to use wikis in the classroom.

Three Wiki Uses The author breaks wiki use down into three general categories: knowlege repositories, collaborative writing and situation awareness.

Using Group Wikis Online Bill Ashton, from York College, posts an in-depth presentation about using group wikis online on one of his blogs on the Commons, Things I say to my BlackBoard students. Also included in Bill’s June, 2012 post are links to his group wiki grading rubrics and a screencast overview of wikis in Blackboard.

Related Pages


Classroom Lecture-Capture Technology – Characteristics and Costs

From CUNY Academic Commons

Contents

iPod with Microphone (Audio only)

Image:IPod-with-mic.jpg

Some iPods can record your voice if you connect a microphone to the docking port (not the Shuffle, and not the most recent generation). A really effective microphone is made by Belkin called TuneTalk.

Pros:
  • Really simple to use/record – wear it in a breast pocket or on an armband while you teach
  • Produces high quality recordings in .WAV format
  • Relatively inexpensive – (~$250)
  • iPod nano 2nd Gen (~$180)
  • Belkin Microphone (~$70)

Cons:
  • Recordings are limited to the length of iPod battery life with microphone attached – usually about an hour
  • The Belkin only works with the 4th gen iPod Video and 2nd Gen iPod-nano (last year’s models)
  • Captures voice only – however, after class audio can be synchronized with images, PowerPoint slides, etc. using a product like Camtasia (an additional ~$200)
  • No automation – file transfers, output file creation, XML file must all be done manually

Marantz PMD660 Digital Recorder + wireless microphone (Audio only)

Image:Marantz.jpg

Pros:
  • Easy to Use
  • Very high quality recordings
  • Uses inexpensive Flash Memory – larger means more hours of recording
  • If an outlet is not available it can operate for 4 hrs on 4-AA batteries
  • Built-in condenser mic – but a wired or wireless mic will produce much better results
  • Has Two XLR mic connections with +48v phantom power
  • Built-in USB port for transferring recordings to your computer or just move the memory card to the computer if it has a reader

Cons:
  • Expensive (~$700)
  • Marantz PMD660 (~$500)
  • Flash Memory Card (2GB ~$30)
  • Wireless Lavalier Microphone (~$200)
  • Captures voice only – however, after class audio can be synchronized with images, PowerPoint slides, etc. using a product like Camtasia (an additional ~$200)
  • No automation – file transfers, output file creation, XML file must all be done manually

Bluetooth Microphone with Camtasia

Image:Bluetooth.jpg

Pros:
  • Records both audio and images, PowerPoint slides, etc. – fully synchronized
  • Audio Quality OK but not great

Cons:
  • Can be tricky to set up and use
  • Moderately expensive (~$400)
  • Camtasia Studio (~$200)
  • Bluetooth Microphone (~$170)
  • Bluetooth Receiver (~$30)
  • No automation – file transfers, output file creation, XML file must all be done manually

Mediasite

Image:Mediasite.jpg

Pros:
  • Broadcasts Live on the Internet
  • Records both video, audio, and images, PowerPoint slides, etc. – fully synchronized
    * Maintains archived recordings – you need a Windows Media streaming server – automatically
  • Provides a full user interface for accessing archived recordings
  • Rack mount and portable versions exist

Cons:
  • Very Expensive (~$18,000 installed + yearly maintenance + Windows Streaming Server)
  • Doesn’t scale easily to multiple simultaneous classrooms
  • Windows Media format only – you will have to convert manually for iTunesU
  • Very limited editing of recordings
  • Tricky to get working for live broadcast – mostly network issues

Echo360

(formerly Apreso Anystream + Lectopia) – http://www.echo360.com/

Pros:
  • Scalable
  • Capture can be fully automated (scheduled) if you wish, or partly automated
  • Multiple output formats – H.264 raw video format

Cons:
  • Expensive
    o For the hardware version you need a server, a capture license & a capture appliance – plus the multimedia equipment in the classroom – computer, projector, etc)
    o For the software version you need a server, a capture license (~$1,500 per year per room) – plus the multimedia equipment in the classroom – computer, projector, etc)
    + Echo360 capture license (~$2,250 per room per year)
    + Hardware capture appliance (~$2000 per room)
    + Installation (~$1,000)
    + Server Hardware (~$2,000-$5,000)
  • Limited editing – removal of contents only – cannot add

[[Category:]]

Automated Lecture-Capture Systems

From CUNY Academic Commons

Contents

Echo360
Introduction

Recently, staff from Queensborough’s Academic Computing Department attended a product demonstration of Echo360 (formerly Apreso Anystream + Lectopia) at Hostos Community College (many thanks to Varun Sehgal, Assistant Vice President – IT). Echo360 is an automated lecture-capture system, a product-line that we at Queensborough have been monitoring for the past few years (see The Competition below).

Major lecture-capture characteristics of interest are:

  • Capturing classroom lectures – voice synchronized with any kind of computer-based presentation, and video capture when desired
  • Automatic creation of major playback entry points thus allowing students to “jump in” to any point in the lecture
  • Editing capability
  • Making captured lectures available in Blackboard and as Podcasts in iTunesU
  • Doing this with little or no teacher intervention or learning curve

Echo360 seems to do all of this and more.

We are rarely impressed with products in this space, because when you dig deep, especially on the technical side of things, you always find major flaws.

From all appearances Echo360 seems to be the real deal. It not only exhibits the major characteristics described above, but it seems to do more and it’s affordable as well.


Technology

Echo360 uses Adobe Flash technology, while most other lecture capture solutions use Windows Media Audio (WMA) or Video (WMV) formats only. In fact, raw recordings begin with H.264, meaning that they can be converted to any desired output format. This makes recordings editable as well.

Lecture capture can be scheduled, or controlled by the teacher:

  • When scheduled, a teacher simply wears a wireless microphone and teaches as she/he normally does – nothing else to do. On schedule the lecture capture is started, stopped, sent to the server, converted to desired format(s), and finally uploaded to the pre-selected destination(s) – Blackboard, iTunesU, etc.
  • When controlled by the teacher it can be as simple as programmed “Start”, “Pause”, and “Stop” buttons on a lecture podium’s control panel. Once stopped the remainder of the process can be as automatic as the teacher chooses.


Editing

If Echo360 has a weakness, it is in the area of editing. The current version allows for editing by a system administrator only, so teachers cannot edit captured lectures themselves. Furthermore, editing is limited to removal of material only, not substitution or addition of materials. The company promises that enhancements to the editing capability are high on their upgrade priority list. Software-Only vs. Hardware-Assisted Capture: There are two ways to entrée into lecture capture with Echo360, the less expensive – less capable software-only method, and the more capable hardware-assisted method. Both require Echo360 server software (therefore a network server to run it) and a Flash Streaming server license (therefore another network server to run that as well).

The Classroom End

  • Software-Only: With Echo360’s capture software installed on your classroom computer or laptop; your voice will be synchronized to whatever appears on the screen.
  • Hardware-Assisted: Echo360 sells an appliance that will capture whatever goes to the projector. This, therefore, supports any and all installed classroom technologies. Whether you teach projecting PowerPoint, a document camera, an annotation screen, digital slides, DVDs, Web sites, programming environments, etc., all will be captured and synchronized with your voice.

The Back End

You will, of course, need the help of your IT department because this is a network-based solution. If there are installation issues, experience tells me that most will be network related, so get your IT Department involved early on.

As stated before, Echo360 server software (therefore a network server to run it) and a Flash Streaming server license (therefore another network server to run that as well) are needed to store, covert, and deliver captured lectures. An Adobe Flash streaming server license can be expensive, but there are alternatives such as the WOWZA server that we are told works well.

Also, in the case of Blackboard delivery, a “building block” must be purchased and installed within the Blackboard environment by, in our case, CUNY IT. I mention this because there is time and a cost ($10,000) associated with building block installations at CUNY. Obviously this would be more cost effective if Echo360 were adopted by multiple colleges and the $10,000 cost divided amongst them.

Sample Rich-Media Output

Click here to see some examples of rich media content created using Echo 360.

Preliminary Conclusions

Is Echo360 a perfect solution? Of course not, but it comes closer than any other platform we have seen to date. Please take a moment to read the experiences of one of Echo360’s early adopters in this article entitled “Lecture Capture Pitfalls”.

Also, please click here watch the first 1:36 of this YouTube video.

At Queensborough we intend to conduct a pilot project using Echo360 hardware-assisted capture in two classrooms with delivery to iTunesU. We will report our experiences at the end of the pilot.


The Competition

Echo360 has much competition including: Tegrity, Panopto, Mediasite, Accordent & others I am sure. Other products such as Camtasia provide pieces of the needed functionality, but are not completely automated solutions.

Queensborough has invested in, and therefore has some experience with, Mediasite technology which works very well, but is not scalable – not easily made available in many classrooms at once. Mediasite is married to Windows Media only, and it is very expensive to purchase and maintain. One thing Mediasite does that the others do not is live Web broadcast, but if you do not need that capability I suggest that you look elsewhere for an automated lecture-capture solution.

Building An On-Line Course

From CUNY Academic Commons

Contents

Building an Online Course

by James G. Lengel, Hunter College

As more and more teachers at all levels put their course materials online, as as we gain more experience with what works and what doesn’t in this environment, it’s a good time to share some suggestions and guidelines for building an online course, or for posting study materials online for a face-to-face course. No matter whether it’s a course in high-school geometry or college-level art history, whether it’s on Blackboard or Moodle or iTunesU or your own web site, here are some ideas gleaned from the leaders in the field.

Optimize the size of a unit of study.

I reviewed a single online unit from a high school course that was quite long, consisting of three sections and dozens of activities, amounting to about three weeks of work. For most students, this is too big a chunk to manage, and results in a long list of activities scrolling way down the page. Better to keep your units short, so that the entire list of assignment fits on one page, above the scroll, and that the work can be accomplished in a fathomable time, such as a week. Most folks in this business have settled on a week’s worth of work in each section or unit, with 8-10 assignments to be done. Following this rubric for chunking the content, a semester-long course would have about 20 units, and a quarter-course would have 10. Whatever unit size you settle on, try to make it consistent across courses and subjects so that students know what to expect.

Always provide reasonable instructions.

Don’t just list a provide a link to an assignment, and don’t just tell students to “go and read this chapter.” Each assignment in an online course should provide a short rationale and clear instructions, such as, “Read this passage from Orwell’s 1984, and as you do ask yourself how the scene might be different if today’s technologies were brought into play. This will prepare you to answer the questions in the next assignment.” Tell them what to do, provide a little guidance, and tell them why they’re doing it.

Balance self-correcting and teacher-evaluated assignments in each unit.

Frequent student responses to content, and frequent evaluation, are keys to successful online learning. Each unit should contain both self-correcting activities such as quizzes, as well as teacher-evaluated assignments such as essay questions. If a student must do at least one responsive assignment in each unit each day, and if the teacher checks this each day, the student is more likely to stick with the program.

Let them do the work right on the screen.

Wherever possible and feasible, have students provide their responses right in a text field on the web page. Avoid displaying questions in Blackboard or Moodle, and asking them to go off and write their responses in a word processor. Better to pose the question, and place a text field right under it for their response. This makes it much more likely that they will actually do the assignment. And it makes it easier for the teacher to use the learning management system see who has done it, to view their writing, and assign a grade to their results. It avoids sending files back and forth by email, and avoids printing on paper.

Use advance organizers.

Rather then sending students off to do some readings, then afterwards assigning them with questions about the reading, consider giving them the questions first, and then send them off to the readings with the questions in mind.

Put the due dates right on the assignment.

Don’t make them go off to a calendar or schedule page for guidance on how to pace themselves. List the target date for each assignment right in the instructions. This is easiest to do if you build week-long units, and you can use days of the week as the pacing: “Read this passage from Orwell’s 1984, and as you do ask yourself how the scene might be different if today’s technologies were brought into play. This will prepare you to answer the questions in the next assignment. (Tuesday).” If you follow this method you’ll never have to change calendar dates when you teach the course again next semester.

Consider including creative assignments.

Balance the quizzes and essays with assignments that require students to draw diagrams, write screenplays, record podcasts, construct slide shows, create photo essays, and produce short videos. All of these can be created on a computer and turned in online through the learning management system. One creative assignment in each unit might be a reasonable goal and would go a long way toward increased student interaction and 21st-century learning. Call it the Project assignment.

Consider some simple labels for each type of assignment.

Avoid unnecessary wordiness by settling on single-word descriptors for each of your item-types. The pages would be easier to use and visually cleaner if long-winded titles such as “What are my goals for this Medieval Civilizations unit?” became “Goals”, and “What do I already know?” became “Pretest” and “What do I need to do in this section on Muslim Civilizations?” became “Assignments.” In this way, the structure of the unit becomes clear: Goals, Pretest, Assignments, Learnmore, Project, Posttest. If everyone used these same labels consistently, the students would find it easier to follow the work.

Online assignments can extend learning beyond the classroom, make it easier for teachers and students to work together, and provide more flexibility in the time and place for learning. As we use this method with our students, we will continue to learn how to improve it.

For more ideas on the topic of online learning, see:

  • Online Education: What’s the Buzz?
  • Supply and Demand
  • Publishing on the Web for Teachers

This article published here with the permission of the author. Jim Lengel is a visiting Professor, Hunter College School of Education (October 2008)